Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.4/8.7.4-MZ) with ESMTP id RAA08071 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 17:45:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA105190584; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 14:43:04 -0800
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 14:43:04 -0800
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <199603122235.OAA07680@holonet.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: jprusins@cybergrafix.com (John Prusinski)
To: lightwave@e55.webcom.com
Subject: Re: Star COmmand
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>SO, anyone see the show Star Command on FOX yesterday? I have not seen
>such poor animation in a long time! The tutorials that come with LW are
>better than the effects and anims on that show! DISAPPOINTMENT!!! I hope
>I am not offending anyone here, but BOY did that suck!
>
Although I agree with you mostly, I thought there were a few interesting
moments in the animation... (remember, I'm still new to LW :~)), but it
would have had to be the greatest CG ever to even begin to make up for the
unbelievably bad script and weak acting (was that Japanese woman the same
one that didn't make it from the B5 pilot to the series?). I was also
impressed by how weak the sound design was... voices often sounded muffled
and/or ambient noise overshadowed the main action to the point of confusing
the action... All in all, makes you long for the days of "Buck Rogers in the
